Several leaves have fallen off the calendar from the crucial time when Jorge Castillo Mendoza, strongly supported by friends and family unanimously decided to embark on adventure journalism literary magazine Riohacha found a city where every day they are born and die media communication as they arrive and leave her restless waves Tues Any further review, he asked someone in a tone of disapproval; How much will it last? It asked another, in a tone of disbelief. And everyone has expressed about the new project. Some assumed it was a mere delusion of provincial journalist and a short flight over company aimed at increasing the huge list of magazines first and only issue of La Guajira. Those who thought so were mistaken. Did not address a crucial and differentiating factor: the tenacity of the Castillo Mendoza and, above all, George, who from his youth, almost from infancy, had at your fingertips with a typewriter which helped to put his startling black and white ideas about popular art, his rigorous vision about the centennial history of the Caribbean, to his delight in well-structured biographical chronicle, the report from the province for the media in the capital. Anyway, while teenagers of his generation ever dreamed of dancing in the style of John Travolta, or enjoy "the last of Diomedes" Jorge toying with the idea of seeing his name to an article in El Espectador and El Heraldo, La Libertad and El Tiempo. While his classmates gave anything to have a new car even if provided, Jorge unveiled by seeing his name on the cover of a book on acting out the stories that plying his mind of visionary man. .
After reading numerous articles about the Socratic origin of coaching, I’ve thought of refute such argumentation. Even there is a company’s HR and Coaching that is referred to as the Greek philosopher (1). Socrates wasn’t a coach, was a philosopher. And coaching can be a philosophy, but not philosophical. The Socratic method in his student Plato’s dialogues, emerges as a fundamental character of that work, on whose banks entered the history of philosophy which is also the history of Western thought.
Penalver says accurately, than the dialectics teaches what he finds teaching (2). Everyone knows, that the method of Socrates is the mayeutico. One who through questions to the peer, going slowly extracting wisdom or wisdom of the questioned. It has classically interpreted as if it were a midwife’s own process. The mother of Socrates is said to that he was midwife at birth in Athens. In this sense it is said that the Socratic process consists more in out-of, as in put-in (3). And hence many coachings affirm that you as Socrates, the coach can never put or impose the wisdom, but should be out in the light of the coachee (questioned). As if the coach would awaken us from the oblivion of being heideggerian.
The same Steiner, interpreted that Socrates taught nothing. But the truth is, that Socrates died poisoned with Hemlock, by fellow coacheados or taught. Do you want to end up like, Coach? the coach cannot be said as the one who only knows that he knows nothing. The coach cannot be limited to listen oracles at Delphi, nor Greek mediums. The coach cannot exercise as a midwife. Socrates was condemned by Athens, why was the Gadfly of Athens. Socrates wanted to demonstrate with his method that nobody knows that they know nothing. It is very different. Socrates was not pleased to his pupil, but Scotland it and aguijoneaba it as the Gadfly on the Io cow.(4) .
Do not disregard the efforts of those who do, but turned the wrong approach to these programs in just one more line of text required for the CV, rather than programs that provide researchers, lighting of new scientific and technical knowledge. And Canada is no exception. Many of the new-arrivant follow this path in hopes of finding better response here. In fact, many believe (and recommend) that is better to make a master here to have a CV more interesting if you decide to return to your country ‘and would have an international master and everyone knows that the best business schools are in North America ‘. As this turns out to be an effective strategy if you come to Canada ‘to tempt fate and see how you go’ (ie, subconsciously take for granted that you do not go well and at least you get something useful before returning) or have in mind really live in your country and come only way to study (since as ‘resident’ educational costs are much lower than for the ‘tourists’). But for those who have come to live here and for those who now question their chosen profession, which is the real solution? The answer is found at the bottom of what you want to do, what you actually get when the monthly support just is not enough and you want to leave a legacy.
If you find out what you want is freedom to choose why, where, what, when and how to do your job because you only have two ways: be an entrepreneur or investor. Both involve a process of transforming yourself and learning of specific topics (or specialization), a vocational reorientation and perseverance bullet proof. But if you want to continue your online career, working for someone else to retirement, because you love your profession, the doors of Canadian universities and loan programs and scholarships are open to you and for your repowering diploma. Good luck in whatever you choose.