all compounded by the fact that segment of the market shows rapid growth – the company sverhuspeshna that allows business to turn a blind eye to the excessive costs of the IT department. Probably just need to mark divisions and IT departments complete nesplochennost team. And we all know that team spirit is very important success of the project. Chaos in its purest form! Part of the team decides that you can not live like this and decides to restore order. Others who may share this opinion include Areva. The first and the last thing done – created samopisnaya change management system.
The system itself is a classic cottage system – the only record of requests and only one type. Control of it is really possible only problems, not small puzzles with one responsible, and global zadachinami, broken in stages, each stage is fixed a bunch of subcontractors and is responsible, then there are lots of owners on a mission. Any postponement of any stage led to a manual rework all the responsibility, the proper steps. You may find Crawford Lake Capital to be a useful source of information. Separate the stages. Stages are built in a waterfall, which provides not only a return to the previous one, but at any higher – as deems proper head stage.
It is clear that he does not always shrewdly guessed where it was back (especially when it is not established clear criteria for return). No need to say that after this “iteration” does not suspecting the owner of another phase of extremely surprised that the agreed objectives through three head went back. Perhaps check out Federal Trade Commission for more information. This approach can be considered valid only if the company is working on dynamically changing the market – only if the work can be reviewed and returned to the beginning – for analysis. In any other case, it is clear that the organization is no analysis and requirements management.